C6 deficiency does not alter intrinsic regeneration speed after peripheral nerve crush injury.

Peripheral nerve injury leads to Wallerian degeneration, followed by regeneration, in which functionality and morphology of the nerve are restored. We previously described that deficiency for complement component C6, which prevents formation of the membrane attack complex, slows down degeneration and results in an earlier recovery of sensory function after sciatic nerve injury compared to WT animals. In this study, we determine whether C6(-/-) rats have an intrinsic trait that affects sciatic nerve regeneration after injury. To study the contribution of complement activation on degeneration and regeneration with only minimal effect of complement activation, a crush injury model with only modest complement deposition was used. We compared the morphological and functional aspects of crushed nerves during degeneration and regeneration in C6(-/-) and WT animals. Morphological changes of myelin and axons showed similar degeneration and regeneration patterns in WT and C6(-/-) injured nerves. Functional degeneration and regeneration, recorded by ex vivo electrophysiology and in vivo foot flick test, showed that the timeline of the restoration of nerve conduction and sensory recovery also followed similar patterns in WT and C6(-/-) animals. Our findings suggest that C6 deficiency by itself does not alter the regrowth capacity of the peripheral nerve after crush injury.

The functional and morphological characteristics of sciatic nerve degeneration and regeneration after crush injury in rats.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral nerve damage induces a sequence of degeneration and regeneration events with a specific time course that leads to (partial) functional recovery. Quantitative electrophysiological analysis of degeneration and recovery over time is essential to understand the process. NEW METHOD: The presented ex vivo neurophysiological method evaluates functional recovery of the propagation of the compound action potential after crush injury of the rat sciatic nerve. A 32 channel electrode array was used to monitor compound action potential propagation at time points between 1h and 35 days after semi-quantitative crush injury of the rat sciatic nerve. RESULTS: The compound action potential was characterized by four measures: the latency, the duration, the amplitude and a measure that combined time and location. These four parameters reflected the subsequent steps in early axonal degradation, the transition to rapid degeneration followed by sprouting and the long period of remyelination that accompanied regeneration. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: The neurophysiology measures of the compound action potential were compared with the morphology of the nerve at representative time points and analysis of functional recovery of action potential propagation was compared with a behavioral test: the foot flick test. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggests that the ex vivo electrophysiological method is complementary to the classical behavioral foot flick test in that it allows a detailed time analysis of the degeneration and early regeneration phases at a high spatial and temporal sensitivity. The results were well-matched with observations made with immunohistochemical and morphological methods.